Articles

Agile Project Leadership in large teams focuses on guiding and inspiring multiple agile teams toward a unified vision and shared goals. Agile leaders cultivate a collaborative and empowering environment, promoting self-organization and cross-functional teamwork. They emphasize servant leadership, where the leader supports and removes obstacles for the teams, facilitating their success. Effective communication, transparency, and adaptability are key, with leaders regularly engaging with teams to provide clarity, resolve conflicts, and foster continuous improvement. Agile Project Leadership ensures alignment with strategic objectives while nurturing a culture of innovation and responsiveness, driving the successful delivery of large, complex projects

Agile Project Leadership in big projects emphasizes adaptability, collaboration, and continuous improvement to manage complexity and drive success. Leaders in agile environments prioritize creating a culture of trust and open communication, empowering cross-functional teams to make decisions swiftly and respond to changing requirements effectively. They focus on delivering value incrementally, ensuring regular feedback loops with stakeholders to align outcomes with business goals. By fostering an iterative approach and maintaining a clear vision, agile leaders navigate the challenges of large-scale projects, promoting innovation and maintaining momentum towards project milestones.

Agile leadership in risk management emphasizes proactive identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks to ensure project success. Agile leaders foster a culture of continuous risk evaluation, encouraging team collaboration and transparency. They utilize iterative processes to monitor potential issues, swiftly adapt to changes, and implement effective solutions. By prioritizing communication and maintaining a flexible approach, Agile leaders effectively manage uncertainties, enhancing the resilience and responsiveness of their teams and ensuring the consistent delivery of value.

How can risk be managed?

Risk Management consists of the following five steps, which should be done iteratively throughout the project:

1. Risk identification: Using various techniques to identify all potential risks.
2. Risk assessment: Evaluating and estimating the identified risks.
3. Risk prioritization: Prioritizing risk to be included in the Prioritized Product Backlog.
4. Risk mitigation: Developing an appropriate strategy to deal with the risk.
5. Risk communication: Communicating the findings from the first four steps to the appropriate business stakeholders and determining their perception regarding the uncertain events.

Risk Identification

The Scrum Team members should attempt to identify all risks that could potentially impact the project. Only by looking at the project from different perspectives, using a variety of techniques, can they do this job thoroughly. Risk Identification is done throughout the project and Identified Risks become inputs to several Scrum processes including Create Prioritized Product Backlog, Refine Prioritized Product Backlog, and Demonstrate and Validate Sprint.

Risk Assessment

The assessment of risk helps in understanding the potential impact of a risk, how likely it is to occur, and when the risk could materialize. The overall effect on business value should be estimated; if that impact is significant enough to outweigh the business justification, a decision must be made whether to continue the project.

The assessment of risks is done with regard to probability, proximity, and impact. Probability of risks refers to the likelihood of the risks occurring, whereas proximity refers to when the risk might occur. Impact refers to the probable effect of the risks on the project or the organization.

In addition to probability, risk assessment also evaluates the potential net effect of risks on the project or organization. These effects can be estimated using techniques such as Risk Models and Expected Monetary Value.

Risk Prioritization

Scrum allows for quick identification and assessment of risks. Identified Risks are taken into account when creating a Prioritized Product Backlog during the Create Prioritized Product Backlog process, or when the Prioritized Product Backlog is updated during the Refine Prioritized Product Backlog process—so a Prioritized Product Backlog could also be referred to as a Risk Adjusted Prioritized Product Backlog.

The risks could be identified and assessed based on any of the Risk Identification and Risk Assessment techniques mentioned earlier.

Risk Mitigation

The response to each risk will depend on the probability and impact of the risk. However, the iterative nature of Scrum with its rapid turnaround time and feedback cycles allows for early detection of failures; therefore, practically speaking, it has a natural mitigation feature built in.

Risk can be mitigated by implementing a number of responses. In most situations, responses are proactive or reactive. In the case of a risk, a plan B may be formulated, which can be used as a fall-back in case the risk materializes—such a plan B is a reactive response. Sometimes risks are accepted and are an example of a risk response which is neither proactive nor reactive. Risks are accepted because of various reasons, as in a situation where the probability or impact of the risk is too low for a response. Acceptance can also be the case in a situation where the apprehension of secondary risks may deter the product owner from taking any action. The effort made by the Product Owner to reduce the probability or impact—or both—of the risk is an example of a proactive response to mitigating risks.

Risk Communication

Because business stakeholders have an interest in the project, it is important to communicate with them regarding risks. Information provided to business stakeholders related to risk should include potential impact and the plans for responding to each risk. This communication is ongoing and should occur in parallel with the four sequential steps discussed thus far—risk identification, assessment, prioritization, and mitigation. The Scrum Team may also discuss specific risks related to their Tasks with the Scrum Master during Daily Standup Meetings. The Product Owner is responsible for the prioritization of risks and for communicating the prioritized list to the Scrum Team.

An important tool which can be used for communicating information related to risks is the Risk Burndown Chart